A. The construction offenses didn't make a difference; The lies and changing versions didn't make a difference; The list of conflicts of interest, which Yitzchak Amit tweeted over and over again, didn't make a difference. It also didn't make a difference that in all the above cases Amit ruled harshly when it concerned other people.
Ahron Barak once said that the leaders of the judiciary were made of different material. We now realize that they are indeed made from a different material. Material of people to whom the law does not apply. The obligation to clean hands does not touch them. They are the law.
Under His Majesty Yitzhak Amit and the chief prosecutor Miara, the State of Israel is not a state of law. The two most powerful people in charge of the law enforcement system, the Chief Justice and the Chief Prosecutor, worked together to eliminate the law in the State of Israel.
They want to reinvent what is considered legal and what is not. What is prosecuted and what not. Who is judged guilty and who is ignored.
B. Dror Hoter Yishai was the head of the Bar Association during the time of Aharon Barak and Shai Nitzan. He wrote a book about it – 'The power is addictive'. The length and great detail hides what is written between its pages: since this system was legitimized for absolute power, it was absolutely corrupted. And there is no one to stop the speeding train.
C. This spider's web, which makes these two systems, the High Court and the main prosecution, act as one, and gives them absolute power, was spun for years by the masterful hand of Aharon Barak. Each one protects the other. But after the sovereignty was seized from the Jewish People, it won't come back through dialogue but only by setting a very clear and sharp boundary in the face of insatiable bullying. A hegemony with this degree of haughtiness and arrogance will not give up its power voluntarily, but only through a nation reclaiming its sovereignty over qQP0⁰0state and country.
D. Noam Solberg's lack of courage should be studied in years to come. He represents a generation of religious nationals who entered the public service with a different worldview, but became dizzy over the years and lost the compass and above all the public courage. They were conquered in a shiny envelope of statesmanship and fake collegiality. They became the slaves of the hegemony instead of public servants.
E. But this smug legal hegemony nevertheless made one grave mistake. Aharon Barak managed to maintain a clean-handed and stately image. He proceeded slowly and carefully. His successors gallop with the bullying of a herd of elephants. Their aggression that screams to the sky will also be what brings them down.
Because what remains of them is a gang in legal robes.
F. Has anyone heard a peep from the entire line of bien-pensants who usually fight for purity of hands when it comes to ministers and elected officials? Did 'Tzohar for Ethics' issue a press release? What about the champions of the 'broad agreements'? Someone?
G. What to do? We need to strengthen our elected officials, and at the same time demand a firm stance from them. They have the responsibility to return us to the path of a state of law that also obliges law enforcers, and to return to the people freedom over their lives.
It will be fixed, and sooner than we think. The removal of the false masks hastens the remedy. Clarity of opinion, courage, a little patience, and it will happen.
